User talk:Scriptgirl

Welcome!

Hello, Scriptgirl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jokestress 05:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Troy Garity

Thanks for the recent edits to Troy Garity! I removed a lot of it because it is not sourced from a published report. See verifiability and reliable sources for what can and can't be used. I hope you'll continue editing, and again, welcome! Jokestress 05:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Globe and Mail link was exactly what we need. However, the more general ones need to link to the quotations that back up the statement. eonline did not have an article I could find about the engagement. sunshinedna.com has no article about their relationship. We need links to articles where the information is sourced. Author, date, headline, publication. Otherwise we can't use it. Thanks! Jokestress 06:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the excellent sourcing! I formatted them in the Wikipedia format. You improved the article a lot! Unfortunately, the on-set information is going to have to come out unless it's sourced. It's cute and charming, but it's not really encyclopedic, either. If you find any other sources you want to add, just drop me a note if you have any questions. Jokestress 06:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jokester-

I have a personal email from the blog writer that confirms the onset info — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scriptgirl (talk • contribs)

Personal emails are unfortunately not considered reliable sources. Please see WP:RS for more info. Also, I took out the word "forced" because it suggests something that isn't in the sources; namely, that they were reluctant and "forced" into an engagement. Again, nice work! Jokestress 06:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]