User talk:Seanhinckley

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to water fluoridation controversy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. · j e r s y k o talk · 03:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to water fluoridation controversy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. · j e r s y k o talk · 03:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to water fluoridation controversy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. · j e r s y k o talk · 12:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with the article, discuss it on the article's talk page instead of merely blanking large portions of its text and re-crafting them to your liking. · j e r s y k o talk · 12:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

With regards to your comments on User talk:Jersyko: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. · j e r s y k o talk · 12:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]