User talk:Seenoahrunacrossthefield

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nate Blasdell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 20:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello, if you want to start a deletion discussion for the article Nate Blasdell, you need to go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Blasdell and say why you want the article deleted. Please see the deletion policy to see the reasons for deleting articles. If you don't give a valid reason, this discussion will be closed. Please let me know if I can help in any way.--BelovedFreak 20:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Noah! I see that you did figure out how to nominate the article Nate Blasdell for deletion. I wanted you to see my comments from that discussion - and to encourage you to keep editing at Wikipedia. You might start by creating a userpage for yourself (just click the red link "userpage" at the top of this discussion page). My comment was:

"I see that the nominator, seenoahrunacrossthefield, was also the creator of the article - and earlier tried to get rid of it by blanking the page, which of course was reversed. Welcome to Wikipedia, noah. You will eventually learn how to do these things, and I trust you will create lots of articles that you DON'T later wish to delete. In this case, I agree with you that the article should go. The references are not from reliable sources and do not establish notability. Meanwhile you might want to read up on WP:Reliable sources and How to cite sources. And you can always practice using the Wikipedia:Sandbox. --MelanieN (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)"

P.S. If you have questions or need help, you can click on the word "talk" after my name. --MelanieN (talk) 15:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)