User talk:Sentinel R/Archive 2011

Done

Use it well. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 12:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Wifione! Sentinel R (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sorry, you may be intrested in discussing this issue. (Thread is AN/I#RevDel needed) It's... MR BERTY! ^talk/_stalk 19:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not attack other editors.[1] Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. El on ka 19:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Balochistan_conflict. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. El on ka 20:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jundullah article

In the section of views I added this: "Jundullah have been refered to as seperatists by various media,[33][34][35][36][37] the group's leader Abdolmalek Rigi, has however always denied the organisation had any seperatist agenda,[2][5][6][8]" - this is basicly showing both views and reporting what has been said by others in an as neutral and objective way as possible. Please tell me what is wrong or biased about this, cause I don't see it at all...

BTW, I think it's strange you accuse me of making Iranian propaganda if all I'm doing is reporting the offical goals of an anti-Iranian organisation, on their article (rather than the view which is usually promoted by Iranian media).Kermanshahi (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI tag

I have restored the "resolved" tag to the ANI thread, please do not remove it again.[2] The purpose of the administrators' noticeboard is to obtain the attention of an administrator. Okay, you have an admin's attention now, mine. From this point forward, please keep content discussions on the article talkpages, not at ANI. --El on ka 20:49, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kerkuk

Thanks, I'm glad to be unblocked aswell. As for Kerkuk, there was agreement that they would hold a referendum and it's in the Iraqi constitution that they should, but due to heavy opposition from nationalists in Iraqiyya and also tensions on the ground, the Iraqi government has not held it yet. As part of the new Iraqi government agreement, al-Maliki agreed to hold one within the next two years. Weather it will happen, we have to still see, it depends on how political developments go.Kermanshahi (talk) 08:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Hello,

I see you undid my revision. I do not want to get into an editing war, so please be kind enough to explain your reasoning for doing so.

Regards, (Bot3skfjs (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. This map is more detailed than you added. On your map, even the unmarked human settlements.Sentinel R (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That map is inaccurate and confusing. For example, since when has Somaliland claimed the Galgala region in Bari ( formerly Italian Somaliland)?

(Bot3skfjs (talk) 05:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

This user is the author of the map. Can you provide to Ingoman the inaccuracies and confusing in the map? Because his map looks much better appearance than what you have added.Sentinel R (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you replaced the other image with this one, I think you should be the one to contact the author and have him correct the inaccuracies.

(Bot3skfjs (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I wrote to him.Sentinel R (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Replied on my talk page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:14, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. Please do. When it is utter garbage of course it should be nuked.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reposting of warnings on other users' talk pages

Hi. Just a note to remind you that it's OK for people to remove warnings from their talk pages, since that constitutes awareness of said warning. I declined User:Ambelland's AIV on you for that reason (and also insufficient warning) but you should know that, since not knowing it has started more unpleasantness than I care to remember. Daniel Case (talk) 00:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep doing this I will seriously consider a block. Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambelland (talk • contribs) 20:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]