User talk:Serena816
| This user is a student editor in Cornell_University/NS1150_Health,_Health,_and_Society_(Spring_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Serena816, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
NS1150
[edit]Hi Serena816, Based on the information you provided for your article selections I am going to assign you to edit the article on "Electrolyte imbalance" Please let me know if you have any questions. Saguaromelee (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
References
[edit]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Feedback for annotated bibliography
[edit]Nice start on your annotated bibliography, and you're doing a good job of paying attention to the strengths and weaknesses of each study and their relevance in terms of supporting or refuting your controversy. You may want to find more systematic review or meta-analyses (try the article type filters in PubMed) or books to bolster your sources. Let us know if you have questions!
Camand74 (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
It looks like your most recent annotations have to do with dates. If you're changing the article you're editing just let us know! Camand74 (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)