User talk:Shanghai Defender

Roland Nicholson

I have managed to aquire you five more days to find and list the sources as described in WP:CITE. If you do not complete the task under that time limit, I have moved the article to my user namespace for you to work on it here without any worry of its deletion.Dædαlus T@lk\^{→quick link} 06:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Nicholson, Jr

A tag has been placed on Roland Nicholson, Jr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Roland Nicholson, Jr is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Roland Nicholson, Jr saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Triple3D 06:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roland Nicholson, Jr

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roland Nicholson, Jr, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Looks like a SPA vanity article - notability not likely

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rklawton (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]