User talk:Shogiru
Nomination of Alan Baker (shogi) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Baker (shogi) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Baker (shogi) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marchjuly (talk) 03:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Wikiproject Shogi
[edit]Hi Shogiru,
It's nice to come across other editors on Wikipedia who are actual shogi players. I think there lots ways that many of the shogi-articles already on Wikipedia can be improved and there's lots of new articles that can be added. I'm trying to do some of that myself, but it would be better if there was some kind of structure to work within where people really interested in shogi could get together and discuss shogi-related articles, etc. That's why I made a proposal to start a new Wikiproject called Wikiproject Shogi. Please check out the proposal and let me know what you think. Of course, it's Wikipedia so everybody is welcome to participate, but it would also be nice to have actual shogi players involved too for advice and suggestions. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think, it's very proper idea, and I wish to start the same project in ruwiki for a long time. The only thing that stops me is that 1) in ruwiki I'm still the only editor, who regularly makes shogi articles (although there's some good help from others), 2) 1,5 yrs in wiki, but still low experience (especially zero in starting projects), 3) very bad english, not enough for writing articles and 4)big gaps, when I live offline. So, I'm ready to help this project, but there's a big need to spellcheck my contrubution, and it would be non-regular. I could help a bit with translations from jawiki and ruwiki, but not in a very big amount.Shogiru (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for supporting that proposal. Please don't worry about your English ability. Obviously, since it's English Wikipedia, one's English ability is somewhat important; it is, however, not the only thing that matters. Even though I'm a native English speaker, I don't consider myself to be an expert on the language. We all have our strengths and weakness, and we all make mistakes. One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that it's pretty easy to correct any mistakes that are made.
- Marchjuly (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for supporting that proposal. Please don't worry about your English ability. Obviously, since it's English Wikipedia, one's English ability is somewhat important; it is, however, not the only thing that matters. Even though I'm a native English speaker, I don't consider myself to be an expert on the language. We all have our strengths and weakness, and we all make mistakes. One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that it's pretty easy to correct any mistakes that are made.
Disambiguation link notification for January 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan Baker (philosopher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shizuoka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Alan Baker (philosopher) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Baker (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Baker (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gonbad-e Qabus.JPG
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Gonbad-e Qabus.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Shogiru. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shogiru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)