User talk:Shrek976

My talk page

Re this edit: Please do not remove anything from my talk page, especially once I have already responded to it, even if it is an earlier post of yours. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 21:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disney Channel Original Movies

Owen X since people keep editing the List of Disney channel movies I have decided that the Disney Channel Original Movies page should from this day forward no longer be a redirect link. Instead it will be a page for all Disney Channel Original Movies that do not go beyond the current year. So the list of Disney channel movies page can be edited by anyone and not have people complaining about fake Disney movies. I hereby decree that the list of Disney channel movies page can be edited by anyone and not have people complain about the page having fake information that has not been officially announced by the people at Disney channel.

I'm afraid it is not up to you to "decree" anything. All Wikipedia pages are meant to be edited by anyone, whether you like it or not. The Disney Channel Original Movies page is included in its entirety in the List of Disney Channel movies page, so I reverted the former back to a redirect, as it should be. Please do not create "split" or backup versions of articles to preserve your work. That is not how Wikipedia works. Read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles for more details. Owen× ☎ 21:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rumored Disney Channel Orginal Movies

"I made it for people who justed wanted to create fake movie names so that they could use that page for rumors instead of making rdits that are fake to the list of disney channel movies"

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:OwenX"

Wikipedia isn't for rumors. You can put this stuff on your own webpage, or on your userpage. Pan Dan 21:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pan Dan I am not the one making rumors actually I dislike rumors more then anyone else on wikipedia that is why I made the rumore page so that people could stop leaving rumors about future that have not been confirmed so with the rumor page they could post the rumors on the page i made. Shrek976

We don't want you to use a Wikipedia article as a place to put rumors. You can use your userpage for that. Other people can post rumors on your userpage too. And please stop changing other people's comments, as you just did to mine. Pan Dan 21:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Edits to PlayStation...

I know (or at least hope) that you just want to help Wikipedia, but please preview your changes before submitting them. Infoboxes are good, but you should make sure you know how to do them first.

I hope this didn't offend you in anyway. Just a friendly reminder. Abby724 03:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'm already starting to help.

People make mistakes. I'm pretty sure you thought the article was an article for all the PlayStation consoles. Abby724 03:37, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin status

Someone claiming to be you wrote on my talk page: Can you promote me to being an adminstrator I have done a lot of good deeds on wikipedia plus i had another wikipedia account where i was an adminstrator but my house went on fire and my computer was burnt in the fire along with the page that i kept so i could remeber my username so i had to make a new usernanme so can i please be an adminastrator please please please my username is shrek 976.--Shrek976Sunday May 20 5:17 Pm

In case this was in fact you: I find it hard to belive that an admin 1) could not remember his username; 2) would not know who could and who could not make soemone an adimin (I can't); 3) would leave multiple msgs, faking a signature while not logged in; 4) would post a msg at the top of my talk page, ignorign the request and the common practice to add such msgs to the bottom; etc. If you reall want to be an administrator, read WP:RFA where the process is explained. DES ^(talk) 01:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Flubeca^Talk 04:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, you will be blocked from editing. Sebi _[talk] 04:36, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you're making are against consensus. The consensus on the talk page was that we would cover the plot when the book was released. It has now been released in the UK and Eastern US. There's no reason not to include a plot summary.--Chaser - T 04:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Tyler trogger"

A page you created, Tyler trogger, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]