User talk:Sjhcq

Vatt lobo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vatt lobo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Vatt lobo. J Milburn (talk) 19:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits in the Peruvian Army and T-55 articles appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Cloudaoc (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vatt Lobo

The article Vatt Lobo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

For one, it looks like a toy. For another one, it seems bizarre that a light jeep would be carrying heavy firepower such as anti-tank rockets and one heavy machine gun, given that a few well-placed rifle shots could probably kill the driver and blow out the tires.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elryacko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really find it absurd that someone personal judgment to determine whether an article can be published or not published in Wikipedia, while not against the publication policy of wikipedia, can not be deleted, and as someone can not like , many others if you may like. In that sense I think the poor support the Elryacko user says. SJHCQ user.

Articles for deletion nomination of Vatt Lobo

I have nominated Vatt Lobo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vatt Lobo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Elryacko (talk) 05:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The VATT LOBO (wolf) vehicle is being used by the Peruvian Army and Peruvian Navy, a person who knows no weapons, not military, and is not engaged in these issues, it's just an amateur giving a point of view and only should remain so, if you do not like something, or have adverse feelings to something or someone, is no reason to neglect the effort or the work of others, therefore, if it is against policy publications wikipedia, should not be deleted article. SJHCQ user.

File:LEON 2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:LEON 2.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:LEON 2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LEON 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]