User talk:SkyGeek123

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Nemov. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Bald and Bankrupt, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Nemov (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Josh Cahill. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

I have instituted a page block at Josh Cahill as described here. You are still free to edit all other pages at Wikipedia, but it is clear from the past block, and from your editing history at the article, that you are unable to obey WP:NPOV while editing at the article, and your continued edit warring and mischaracterizing the editing of others at that article as "vandalism" when it clearly is not is an ongoing problem. --Jayron 32 16:47, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]