User talk:SlamBurger

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Ted Nugent. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. --Elliskev 20:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from personal attacks, like using the term "pig-headed user" as you did on the Talk:List of Avengers members. Also, please read wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Reliability and Wikipedia:Verifiability. I personally tend to think that Brevoort would probably be willing to make a post on the notice boards, or maybe add something to his blog, indicating that D-Man is an official member of the team. If we were to have that outside verification, that would be enough. At this point, what I would do if I were you would be to maybe go to the talk page of Wikipedia:Verifiability and ask specifically what sort of communication would be required to indicate that the source is verifiable, and give a brief description of the situation. Then, if you were to e-mail Brevoort again, indicating what kind of statements would qualify as reliable, he could make such a statement which would be able to be used as a source. Again, though, as per the policies above, we can't accept an e-mail we haven't ourselves even directly seen as being proof of anything, unfortunately. But, if we could verify that Brevoort made that statement, in compliance with existing policies, that would be another matter. And, personally, like I said, I think, given the high appearance anything from wikipedia has on google searches, there is a very real chance he'd be willing to make some statement which could be counted on as verifiable for our purposes. John Carter (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Avengers members. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Versus22 _talk 21:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Greetings! I was considering offering mediation on the List of avengers members-page, but from your description I wasn't able to figure out which discussion this was concerning. Would you help me out by being a little more specific? Delaque (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

It's the argument between Spshu and myself, SlamBurger, concerning the membership status of "D-Man" as an offical member of the Avengers team. Honestly, it is so full of comic book minutia I don't know if someone who isn't intimately acquainted with such things could be of much help but I appreciate the effort.SlamBurger (talk) 13:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Mediation of D-Man's Membership Status

Hello, I have accepted this case on behalf of the Mediation Cabal. I have left comments here. Please try and remain civil throughout the discussion. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Spshu

Fortdj33 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Just a quick note, to let you know that I appreciate your support on the List of Avengers members talk page. I agree that Spshu has a problem accepting any changes to that page which don't correspond with his personal views. I'm not trying to instigate anything, because I know that you and him have argued in the past, but you might want to watch how often you poke at him on the Talk page, because he seems to be keeping track... User:Spshu/Sandbox.

Hopefully, if we come to a consensus about references and reserve membership and such, he will be outnumbered and back off, but I won't hold my breath. Anyway, thanks again for joining me in keeping the List of Avengers members as accurate as possible, without getting into another edit war with Spshu. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

When do you think someone will go ahead with the changes proposed on the talk page for Spider-Man, Darkhawk and Moondragon? I've been waiting for someone else to act on what we discussed, so that it doesn't look to Spshu like I'm just expressing my personal POV. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

FYI...Spshu is up to his old tricks again on the List of Avengers members article. I expect another confrontation with him on the talk page, but I thought I'd let you know, that he is still childishly keeping track of every post that he disagrees with, on his user page at User:Spshu/Sandbox1. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

That is something he has done quite often in the past. Waiting for things to quiet down and then coming in and making all the edits he thinks are appropriate. I haven't had as much time to dedicate to this page lately as I have had in the past and your vigilance is appreciated.SlamBurger (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Current Avengers roster

Hello SlamBurger! Just thought I'd let you know if you don't already, that there's a discussion on the talk page for the List of Avengers members article, regarding the best way to display who is currently an active member. Please consider adding your opinion to the discussion, so that we can come to a consensus, by replying under the "Current Roster" section. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2013

Under the section Career, it says she is 17 in 2002, this is impossible if she were born in 1981. Her music career either began at 17 or in 2002 with the release named? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.160.9.129 (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)