User talk:Smallvillefanatic/Archive 1
Smallville
[edit]The part I was saying was irrelevant was the part about Oliver having the ring. I honestly didn't notice the bit about Oliver being Lex the first time. When I read it the second time, I realized that you were introducing your own assumptions into the article, which is considered original research. If you're feelings were hurt, I'm sorry. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 01:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Tarantulaflores.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tarantulaflores.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Can you please check out Blackest Night: Batman and then give your thoughts on it on the deletion page. Please do not edit anything. --Schmeater (talk) 02:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Schmeater, I can't see the page that was deleted, so I can't really comment. I'm sorry. Once the series comes out, I'm sure that a page will open up again (Smallvillefanatic (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC))
Category:Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal
[edit]I would personally prefer Roman Catholic sex abuse cases instead of Sex abuse cases of the Roman Catholic Church because the first name indicates that the cases are being committed by certain deviant individuals, and not by the Church itself. The Church is comparable to a large human corporation, which includes both laity and clergy with all their faults, and so to imply that the abuse cases are of the Roman Catholic Church would be like writing Sex abuse cases of the United States of America or Sex abuse cases of the People's Republic of China, which is technically inaccurate, at least in human terms. ADM (talk) 01:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- I understand your concern, but the title isn't just referring to sexual abuse cases committed by Catholics but specifically by those in positions of authority like priests and religious. The term "Church" has many meanings, and one of them is in reference to those in authority in the Church in its other senses. I'd be happy to put together another term, but I'm not sure what it would be. There needs to be something more than just "Roman Catholic", since that would include every Roman Catholic and that's not the intent of the category, but I'm open to suggestions. (Smallvillefanatic (talk) 00:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC))
- What about Sex abuse cases of the Roman Catholic clergy ? If you're specifically talking about priests, religious or bishops, then the proper term is probably clergy. Don't be mixing up the clergy with the laity, that's a very pre-Vatican II thing to do, that's why at the Council the Church was specifically defined as the people of God. There is a name for such a thing, and it's called clericalism, meaning that the only thing that is taken into account by the casual observer is the administrative role of the clergy. And yet, in modern times, most dioceses are not entirely run by the clergy, but are actually managed by small teams of dedicated laypeople that effectively control the Church. ADM (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- I thought of that, but religious aren't necessarily clergy. Clergy = ordained. So, the term doesn't apply to religious brothers, for example. "Church" has a number of meanings, both theological and secular, so don't assume that a definition from Vatican II excludes other theological definitions (Body of Christ, Bride of Christ, Visible Sacrament of Saving Unity, etc.) or secular definitions that non-Catholics use, one of which is the so-called "institutional" Church. Remember this isn't a Catholic site, so you can't just insist on a narrowly theological (in fact, narrow even for a theological) definition (Smallvillefanatic (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)).
- What about Sex abuse cases of the Roman Catholic clergy ? If you're specifically talking about priests, religious or bishops, then the proper term is probably clergy. Don't be mixing up the clergy with the laity, that's a very pre-Vatican II thing to do, that's why at the Council the Church was specifically defined as the people of God. There is a name for such a thing, and it's called clericalism, meaning that the only thing that is taken into account by the casual observer is the administrative role of the clergy. And yet, in modern times, most dioceses are not entirely run by the clergy, but are actually managed by small teams of dedicated laypeople that effectively control the Church. ADM (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Batman-and-robin-2.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Batman-and-robin-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Robingrayson.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Robingrayson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Underworldunleashedpatternsoffear1.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Underworldunleashedpatternsoffear1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:AntmanGrow.gif)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:AntmanGrow.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}