User talk:Sneller1234

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sneller1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I’ve been suspected of being someone I know I’m not. Now someone requested this user account be locked rendering it completely useless. Gives me every reason to create another account since unblock requests rarely — if ever — get granted. Sneller1234 (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Threatening to evade your block is all but a guarantee your unblock will indeed be declined. Regardless, you have not addressed the overlap mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kingshowman/Archive. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See this. It’s bad enough the person blocked me without warning and now they’re resorting to locking. I don’t understand why these people choose to act as if they own the Wikipedia website and they feel they can decide who can edit and who cannot. If you don’t like the fact we’re editing, that’s too bad. You need to start treating new editors like human beings and then you’ll have a better experience if you use common sense and assume good faith. Sneller1234 (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: there really is no such thing as “block evasion” — especially when you get blocked suddenly without warning. It’s like trying to stop somebody from using Google or Facebook in an attempt to coerce them from enjoying their benefits. Well, I have a right to enjoy a public Internet forum like Wikipedia and I won’t let others rob me of the chance to contribute. Sneller1234 (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have no rights here. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.