User talk:Soulman

Speedy deletion declined: Remo Vinzens

Hello Soulman, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Remo Vinzens, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's a credible assertion of signiicance, but the credibilty of the assertion does seem very thin. This should definitely be tested at WP:AfD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Soulman. This looks to me like either a hoax or a non-notable person. The references just don't stand up to any scrutiny. The IMDb sources could have been written by anyone; "www.breakingnews-24.com" sounds like a news website, but just a quick look shows it's a "Remo Vinzens" website. Do you want to start the WP:AfD or should I? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pete, if you could start the WP:AfD that would be nice. As for your hint to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion ...noted. Maybe it was more obvious to me as I already did some research for the German Remo Vinzens pages. Same author for both wikis (which might be Remo Vinzens himself) plus support for keeping the page from a sock puppet of him, plus this page has been deleted in the past already (in the German wiki two times - here once as a far as I can see). Many other hints that at least the majority of proofs for any "significance" where fabricated. Soulman (talk) 22:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia basics

Read WP:LEAD. It just summarizes the body. New content about history would go in Aspirin#History
Read WP:VERIFY
read WP:GA. Aspirin is a WP:GA, so edit it carefully.
Read WP:EW. If you make a mistake and someone reverts you open a discussion on the article talk page and ask why. Don't edit war. Jytdog (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Basically you are one of the persons why Wikipedia suffers declining author numbers. The changes I made are more or less reflecting well known facts today and mentioned in many other wiki articles. If I didn't do it right you could have mentioned that on TALK or here. Did you do that? Nope, you just reverted. If the only thing you can think of is deleting – so even taking the chance to add sources later - then you are part of the problem. And the edit war started with a nuke from your side: Just deleting. I did not check, but I guess you deleted it again although I added some sources - am I right? Yes. I am frustrated now and will not edit any EN articles anymore. If you think that that's a good thing - okay. Thank you for your support. --Soulman (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]