User talk:Spat1989

December 2018

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brian Kemp without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 12:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jackfork. Hope you are well. I did make edits individually and made explanations for each one. If you would like for me to explain it again, I can do so. Thank you for contacting me. Still learning the world and works of wikipedia!

Edit-warring on Brian Kemp

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello Snooganssnoogans. I have explained all the edits that i have made. Please see the edit history. I have explained them all. But to revert the full change is without justification is a problem.

So Op-Ed pieces are reliable?