User talk:Spinnythingeditor123

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hurricane Ian, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't think that edit you made is needed. Sarrail (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarrail: What did I do to make my edits nonconstructive?

Spinnythingeditor123 (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: "It is very big spinny thing". That is why the edit you made is not constructive. Ian is not a very big spinny thing. Sarrail (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Coriolis Effect, Ian was indeed spinning! Spinnythingeditor123 (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the edit you made was unconstructive, which is one of the few factors resulting in your block. Sarrail (talk) 18:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 01:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Toyota Prius. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If someone doesn't know that a wheel spins when the vehicle moves they probably aren't capable of reading a Wikipedia article. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DUH ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spinnythingeditor123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edits were true and constructive. For example, some people might not know that the Toyota Prius's wheels spin when it's in motion. If you want me to stop editing things that spin, I will be more than happy to do that. Spinnythingeditor123 (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.