User talk:Sripsb

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Aloe vera appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Meph^talk 08:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Aloe vera with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Meph^talk 08:40, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hydroquinone, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 08:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Salicylic acid with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. wintonian ^talk _edits 09:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I did not know the rules so please pardon me and unblock .

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding promotional or similar links or commentary to articles. See WP:SPAM. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Pedro : Chat 09:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you did not know the rules before, which would be reckless, you continued to insert spam into the website, which can only be intentional. Your request is regretfully denied. Bearian (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links to the talk pages of likely socks of User:Sripsb[edit]

Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added another likely sock to the above list. Hamamelis (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]