User talk:Stapekian

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Carol Stapek. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Admin Zoe. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Flakeloaf 01:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like you just fine, now that you are indefinitely blocked for creating Admin Zoe. How do you like me now? User:Zoe|(talk) 01:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Stapekian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.99.255.166 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

personal attacks

Blocking administrator: Zoe (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stapekian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The people who got me blocked were given no chance to act on the personal attack warning. After receiving the warning at 1:23, they were banned less than a minute later. For this reason and the ones I previously posted, I should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, I don't buy your story -- your account was created, made a grand total of about 6 edits, by the looks of things, and then got blocked for disruption, all on the same day. If the account was compromised, it appears to have been breached from its very creation. Unless you had a more compelling explanation? -- Luna Santin 10:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

((unblock|The people who got me blocked were given no chance to act on the personal attack warning. After receiving the warning at 1:23, they were banned less than a minute later. For this reason and the ones I previously posted, I should be unblocked.))

To clarify, my posting the warning and Zoe's decision to block you were not related; administrators (which I am not) are free to block users without warning for behaviour which violates Wikipedia policy. If I can offer a suggestion, your best bet right now is to take this up with User talk:Zoe and try to talk your way out from underneath the block. Flakeloaf 10:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]