User talk:Steefash

Welcome!

Hello, Steefash, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. -- samtar ^whisper 14:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that your assertion "English version should match the Arabic version" has no base in fact or policy, and simply seems to confirm that you have some sort of conflict of interest and/or lack of the necessary neutral point of view regarding this person. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your files for upload request

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, --Majora (talk) 21:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Steefash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "PMUOfficial". The reason given for PMUOfficial's block is: " There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".

Blocking administrator: Orangemike (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This account is clearly related to PMUOfficial, and so has now been blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla, this is not fair to block my account, I am working in a University and it could happened to have more than one person come from same IP and also they might work on the same task, please help me to unblock my account and unblock the IP. You could warn me first. I am looking for your cooperation. And also I did not did any harm. Steefash (talk) 11:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You both just randomly make exactly the same edit from exactly the same IP address? It stretches credulity to believe you are unrelated editors. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Yamla, we both are still new users and don't know all the wikipedia rules, in fact we are working within same team, and the amendment has been done based on my request. therefore he created different account without knowing that this violating Wikipedia rules, anyway I'm been blocked because of this mistake, please tell me how I could solve it and I assure you that next time I will make sure this will not happened again. I hope you could help me to keep my account and you can delete the PMUOfficial account if you want. Steefash (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can make new unblock request, but you'll have to convince us that you understand the rules, and to tell us what kind of edits you want to make if unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Steefash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16749 was submitted on Oct 19, 2016 07:16:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]