Jump to content

User talk:Steve300659

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Steve300659! Thank you for your contributions. I am HiLo48 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! HiLo48 (talk) 07:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Creek

[edit]

being 1961 and past most of trove, I can't find built stats but there is two Deep Creek Dams, the other one has the 4,900 Mogo Dave Rave (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC) Steve300659 (talk) 00:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Creek Dam (Tumbarumba, NSW), Jagumba , NSW, Australia

[edit]

Re:-Dave Rave (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Snowy Hydro ~ Deep Creek / Deep Creek Dam (Tumbarumba, New South Wales) / Concrete Gravity / Crest Height = 21.3M / Crest Length = 54.9M,
No problem with Dam Wall Crest Heights / Lengths & Volume
GROSS CAPACITY (103m3) = 5(ML), Wiki = 11(ML), 6ML difference ? / Year=1961
--Steve300659 (talk) 07:21, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see your weeks of in depth google searching has completely assuaged your lack of knowledge on the point, that I have already made, that there are two, count them 2, ((the number two)), dams of the same name, nomenclature, Deep Creek, and while they are both, sort of, maybe, in the same area, they are not, easily distinguishable, recognizably as different entities. one being associated with the Snowy and one not. Are you keeping up ? [( I do so love being snarky when I'm right and you are not )] Dave Rave (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Your reason here Steve300659 (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)}

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steve300659 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

This account is not directly blocked. If you are unable to edit, please exactly follow the instructions which appear when you attempt to do so. Yamla (talk) 15:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.