User talk:Still wasted
Speedy was declined once. Don't try to keep adding to try to get your way. Also you must tell the author when you add a speedy template - I see no addition of such at User talk:Prisonermonkeys Ronhjones (Talk) 23:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- You condone, even support, the attack page because another administrator failed to do his clear duty? You fail in your duty to protect Wikipedia from this sort of violation because of a technicality? Appalling. Still wasted (talk) 09:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here. ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Any unblock request should be read with User_talk:Ronhjones#Thanks Ronhjones (Talk) 17:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones:, I'll be interested to see if you now uphold WP:POLEMIC with equal vigour, and take action against Prisonermonkey for disruption as suggested there for unblanking, and reblank the offending page permanently as is clearly in flagrant violation - or can you tell us why I'm wrong about that? Still wasted (talk) 18:11, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Any unblock request should be read with User_talk:Ronhjones#Thanks Ronhjones (Talk) 17:59, 15 February 2014 (UTC)