Jump to content

User talk:Stlamanda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Stlamanda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Zagalejo^^^ 21:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

[edit]
Enjoy your work Vistawhite (talk) 21:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Stlamanda. You have new messages at Floating Boat's talk page.
Message added 13:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

FloBo A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 13:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed your AFD nomination for the 2011 Baltimore Grant Prix article; the debate may be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Baltimore Grand Prix (IndyCar). Don't forget to follow all of the steps at WP:AFD when nominating, and don't be afraid to ask for help at WT:AFD if you need it. Leave me a message if you have any questions. Thanks! UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles poll

[edit]

Hello — this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. Jburlinson (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this to AfD for the reasons set out at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teroy de Guzmán. You are certainly correct that the article currently lacks reliable sources. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Arxiloxos! Much appreciated!--Stlamanda (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stlamanda (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am appealing as I am not a sock puppet and my opinions are my own. I do not take sides in my edits, and approach editing in as fair a manner as I can, letting the sources be my guide. I am happy to discuss the merits of my edits, but I can only say that blocking me is simply not valid. If someone is using my IP address for editing with another account, that is a hack; if I knew how to check this I would. I have not had any time lately to do any editing (life gets in the way sometimes), but I would like to do so again in the future. I just don't understand how this is happening. All I can say is that any errors are my own, and this is the only Wikipedia account I am associated with. Please reinstate my account.Stlamanda (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I accept the conclusion at the SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.