User talk:Storybizcoach

Hi:

I apologize for not reading Wikipedia's formatting rules. I submitted, as a class assignment and was under deadline pressures. I have saved the informational links and have been studying them intently. I would like to delete this entry (Or wait for your deletion) and try again with the same subject. Since it is unique to Wikipedia. If provided a second chance I will submit to the sandbox and request help and approval from others. I would love to submit in the future and I hope that this can be rectified. Please send an email with your conclusion to: Stacey@storybizcoach.com/ I will await your response.

Sincerely,

Stacey McCall

Hi Paulschn, thank you for reading and for your guidance. This is my fist submission. I incorporated a couple of your suggestions. However, I have to leave for work, but will read more about formatting for Wikipedia. If you so feel inclined I would appreciate your help. Please feel free to make the corrections.

Thanks,

Stacey

StoryBizCoach.com

Ways to improve Integral Science

Hi, I'm Paulschn. Storybizcoach, thanks for creating Integral Science!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article has great information, but is not in the Correct Wikipedia Format!Please check the Wikipedia Manual of style and rewrite this article in the proper style! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS:REFPUNC#Punctuation_and_footnotes

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Paulschn (talk) 22:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Integral Science

Hi, I'm Paulschn. Storybizcoach, thanks for creating Integral Science!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There are references , but not in the right style! Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Paulschn (talk) 22:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC) I will reformat this to align with Wikipedia by tomorrow. I would appreciate help with formatting and editing. Thank you.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Integral Science

~~The article Integral Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:~~

Seems to an essay, full of original research. If "integral science" is really more than a crackpot idea, then a new article should be written about it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, second PROD, not allowed. I'll go though AfD (or CSD) for this page. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Integral Science for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Integral Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]