User talk:Stratawatch

Welcome to Wikipedia Stratawatch. Your edits to Dave Hensman since January 7, 2011 should have drawn a comment from editors before now, sorry for the tardiness. The inclusion of reams of information about a minor court case there is to be considered non-notable, rather than giving undue weight. Wikipedia is not a laundry list of facts. Please familiarize yourself with the standards set for biographies of living persons, where it states "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist." May I suggest you refer to the guidelines of what's worth including at WP:PEOPLE, and the more general notability guidelines at WP:NOTE. Of course if you still disagree about the inclusion of the reverted material there's a conflict resolution process to which we could resort. All of your edits heretofore have involved the same material and page. That does raise a suspicion of vandalism, hence this notice. However I would like to invite you to continue to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith. Petersent (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Stratawatch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 7 05:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Court documents

Please also read WP:BLPPRIMARY 7 05:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Teamwork Property Management

The article Teamwork Property Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a copy of what appears to be a court document

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teamwork Property Management

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 23:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely. Based on your edits, your account appears to only exist to make attacks on a certain company and its actors. Additionally, your account's name violates our username policy and the block of text you have been adding has strong hallmarks associated with the cutting and pasting of copyrighted material. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]