User talk:TBDevilRays2009

{{unblock-ip|24.0.177.181|{{checkuserblock}}|Nishkid64}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.

Request handled by: Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:15, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Response: Devil Rays or Rays

If you're adding something to any related article, and whatever you're adding happened either during or after the the day they officially changed the name, you have to use "Rays" because that IS the name of the team now. Otherwise it would be like still referring to the Nationals as the Expos, or the Tennessee Titans as the Oilers.

Blocked

Following the investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Don't Feed the Zords, you are now blocked indefinitely in accordance with the blocking policy for abuse of multiple accounts. For this reason, I have also revoked the IP Block Exemption placed on your account a few days ago. You may appeal this block by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} below this message. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TBDevilRays2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand. how does nominating a page for deletion result in being blocked?

Decline reason:

When it's suspected -- and then proven -- that you have been abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TBDevilRays2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no proof that the Don't feed the zords account is mine, in fact that user hasn't editted since July

Decline reason:

That's quite irrelevant, since checkuser has confirmed you are using other accounts in a violation of policy. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TBDevilRays2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well I stll don't think this is fair. Nominating an article for deleting shouldn't result in a indef block

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for nominating an article for deletion, but for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. Please do not waste administrators' time with further unblock requests that do not address the reason for your block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.