User talk:TallAutism2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vestron Video has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bluey (2018 TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wyoming Incident[edit]

Hey, just a heads up: you do know the Wyoming Incident is fictional, right? It's an ARG/creepypasta. --Muppet321 (talk) 06:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are many theories as to if it's real or not, but it might be fake. Other than that, we don't have enough source to see if it's fake or real. But, on the original cut, the interruption looks real, mainly because of the fact that the news was running (it was real news BTW), and realisticly enough looks like it was interrupted, especially the static.

Though the mystery still remains as to if it's real or not...

--TallAutism2006 (talk) 09:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Tall Autism[reply]

Oh, honey. No. Just, no. Trust me. It's all fiction. You've been duped. As a general rule of thumb, creepypastas are fiction. --Muppet321 (talk) 18:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you're aware of this, but the Wyoming Incident is a prime example of unfiction: it's a fictional story that insists it's real and exists in the world we live in. But it's not. It's a fictional story inspired by The Ring and the Max Headroom Incident. Any posts purporting to its existence have to be taken as either part of the ARG or people playing along. These are all faked videos, they can "look real" but they're not. --Muppet321 (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On that note, if you're one of the people playing along and trying to contribute to the allure of the mystery by putting it on Wikipedia... this is not the site to do that. --Muppet321 (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it, then. And why the heck did you call me "honey"?

--TallAutism2006 (talk) 08:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)TallAutism2006[reply]

How do I put this: you don't have any actual evidence that the Wyoming Incident is real. There was never any reporting on such an incident, there was just a video someone put on YouTube in 2006, and in fact the only source that could remotely be called "reliable" is a local news outlet that seems to have misinterpreted the various videos on it, as they don't source anything either, they're just reporting off things they saw on the internet. Because there's no reliable source, there's no actual claim to be made that it ever happened, all the talk about it is from forums in which the ARG occurred (namely The Happy Cube) during which they repeatedly acknowledged there wasn't actually a broadcast interruption. Also, the fact that the video "looks real" is not evidence enough in your favor: the Surgeon's photograph of the Loch Ness Monster looks real too, and the photographer later admitted it was a toy boat.
I also noticed that you copied a decent amount of your info from Creepypasta Wiki: Creepypasta Wiki is a fiction site. It says so right on the front page. Everything there is user-contributed with the understanding that it's fiction: the pages themselves however don't say "This is fake" because it ruins the point of it being fiction. I mean, even Night Mind who made one of the most famous videos on the subject started off his Update video with the disclaimer "This didn't actually happen."
And with regards to your asking me to prove it's fake: you have to actually prove it's real first in order for it to even be worthy of being documented on this site as such. And, unfortunately, you haven't. Best place it can go is List of alternate reality games. --Muppet321 (talk) 16:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing: the "original video" (which has been re-uploaded by a poster who acknowledges the whole thing is fake) does look like an actual broadcast except there's a problem: it's made as though the news broadcast continued right where it left off after the video interrupted it. This is logically impossible: were the news story a live broadcast, it would have interrupted the transmission in real time, and the reporters would not be waiting to start the story right where it left off: with the Max Headroom incident, when the news transmission came back online the first thing viewers saw was the reporter reacting. They absolutely would not have gone out of their way to continue from the exact same spot like nothing happened, they would have restarted the story. Likewise, had the news broadcast been pre-recorded, it still would not have come back right where it left off: when the Max Headroom incident occurred during the broadcast of Doctor Who on WTTW, it came back 2 minutes later in the episode (as can be seen in this video), because they would have still been transmitting unaware there was a problem with the signal. --Muppet321 (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could be right. But we still need more evidence, specifically asking about everyone who was around that time who lived/lives in Niobrara Country, but that'll be very hard. Or, we could ask the employees of K2, the channel that was possibly (and I do mean possibly) hacked by it.

--TallAutism2006

I'm sorry, but there's literally no mystery. You're reading a story on the internet and taking it at face value, but there's nothing for you. Show me, or rather show the world, the evidence that it actually happened, I show you the evidence it didn't. You have zero witnesses, your only evidence is a video that is clearly faked, and you seem to be the only one here who doesn't understand that creepypasta is fiction. Next you'll be telling me Marble Hornets or Skeleton Creek or Santa Claus is real. You can ask them, but you're not gonna like what you hear. The only mystery here is why you believe in this so much. You can sandbox a page for it all you want, the moment you try to make an article it's gonna be deleted by someone who will more than likely respond, "This didn't even happen! It's an ARG inspired by the Max Headroom Incident!" --Muppet321 (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Videosonic Logo (1995-2008).png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Videosonic Logo (1995-2008).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TallAutism2006&oldid=1027033196"