User talk:Tanzervaz

FIFA World Cup Format

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article FIFA World Cup Format, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Tanzervaz, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 02:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of "Standings" to World Cup articles

Hi. Thank you for adding sections entitled "World Cup xxxx Standings" to all the world cup articles. Unfortunately these additions (which as far as I can see were not discussed prior to your making them) contravene our policy against original research. Only the first, second, third and fourth places have any official status and to imply otherwise is misleading and unencyclopedic. I have therefore removed these sections. I hope you will understand why I did this. If you disagree, I suggest you discuss at Talk:FIFA World Cup and try to establish a consensus for your edits. Best wishes, --Guinnog 20:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ERKE (Brand)

A tag has been placed on ERKE (Brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Amsaim (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page ERKE (Brand) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Galorr ^{Critique Me} 18:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to ERKE (Brand). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Blogs are rarely reliable sources. Please review the policy on reliable sources and update this article appropriately. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo erke.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo erke.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]