User talk:Teflon Peter Christ/Archive 2022

Archives

2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022

This user is still learning the ropes on how to use Wikipedia, so he may have multiple errors in edits.

February 2022

WP:IMPERFECT. Piotr Jr. (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting finds

Piotr Jr. (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monologue

Death is not an alternative. Nothing exists in death. It is a concept used to encapsulate an idea. You don't fulfill an alternative if you don't exist. There is only life. Nothing is there to fulfill or exist in death. If you are there to fulfill the alternative of death, then you still exist, and there is really no death. You are just somewhere else, and I hope you are well there.

I also found this now, in seeing how original my thoughts were: "Suicide, The Atlas Society | Ayn Rand, Objectivism, Atlas Shrugged" from The Atlas Society.

Piotr Jr. (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent media of note

"Janie Jones" (song)
The Best Man (1999 film)
Alicia Keys (visual/fashion)
"Bullet the Blue Sky" (Rattle and Hum)

Piotr Jr. (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quote of note

"Ruthless people destroy themselves." Piotr Jr. (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

FAC for Late Registration

I thought you'd be interested to know that I have put this article up as a FAC, after you interacted with it while knowing I was in the midst of preparation! --K. Peake 17:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🙌 Piotr Jr. (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake:, I think you might wanna reconsider removing the Shahzaib Hussain source (Highsnobiety). While the publication itself may not be a High quality source in and of itself and in the context of a hip hop topic, the journalist seems to be; he currently writes and edits for Clash ([1]). Anyway, I think it has a good chance of surviving a source review, and its quoted text is highly relevant. Piotr Jr. (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the source and revised the wording, also it will be great to see what comments you have at FAC! --K. Peake 21:19, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 🙏 and gladly if and when I find the time. Superb work overall btw 👏 Piotr Jr. (talk) 22:38, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

30 (Adele album)

Hi Jr. I tried to remove "Melted Stone" which is not a label or imprint, according to the scanned back cover of physical release of the album has only Columbia logo.[2] But eventually reverted by other user. Would you mind to check that please? 183.171.121.80 (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You got it 👍 Piotr Jr. (talk) 04:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable doubt

What am I doing wrong? WPUNJ (talk) 23:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're adding superfluous details like the owner/head of the record label by which the album was released. That goes against the purpose of the lead, which is to summarize the article's subject in a concise manner (MOS:INTRO). 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 23:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I’ve always been grown up as an adult. I don’t agree with the inclusion of the northern US without mentioning the southern US since that too much ignores the contributions of the southern US to rock which was very much more crucial to the history of rock than what the northern US had done. Look at where Little Richard (born in Georgia), Elvis (born in Mississippi), Jerry Lee Lewis (born in Louisiana), Buddy Holly (born in Texas), Fats Domino (born in Louisiana), and many more were born and recorded at (Sun Records in Memphis, etc). Bill Haley and in some ways Chuck Berry were born in the north in Michigan & St. Louis, Missouri respectfully. There’s always been more blacks in the southern US than northern US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TalentedTwin (talk • contribs) 00:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is saying "only" the Northern U.S. You are the one inferring that. If you have reliable sources to augment the claim in the manner you have wished, you are free to do so. But your singular focus on this very particular area of the article begs the question of bias. You have no made one mention of "progressive soul," the article's namesake... 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 02:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

not 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 02:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't say the South didn't breed or originate rock n roll pioneers. It says influential deejays and radio stations in the North were instrumental in transmitting black music and leading it to the greater exposure that would facilitate its transmutation to rock music. You need to get that thru your head. It is stated as plain as day in the article text. The article is not even about rock music per se. So either offer up something reputable and relevant, or stop harping on the same old tangent. 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 02:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here. This is the article text: This trend was expedited by the exposure of young white listeners and musicians to African-American music played by ambitious disc jockeys on radio stations in the Northern United States. Now compare that to anything that you said above and tell me what your point is again. 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 02:20, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 02:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aaliyah album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Village Green Preservation Society peer review

Hey there. I thought you may be interested in my recent expansion to The Kinks Are the Village Green Preservation Society, as I saw you added some content to it a few months back. I opened up a peer review and I'd love to hear what you think, as I'm a big fan of your writing on album articles (especially on another classic 60s LP, Aftermath). No worries if you don't have time to look through it though. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 20:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]