User talk:Teh Slipknot
Welcome!
Hello, Teh Slipknot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ricardo Vincent, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dekisugi (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ricardo Vincent
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ricardo Vincent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Dekisugi (talk) 20:28, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Solihull College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Sturm55 (talk) 20:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Solihull College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Banjo-Kazooie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Revert explain
[edit]You've got my messages. You should read those links I gave. Then you can understand why I reverted your edits. Dekisugi (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nope. Dekisugi (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Solihull College, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 10:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)