User talk:Thadevoos Jr

Welcome!

Hello, Thadevoos Jr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Anjaam Pathiraa did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:12, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Madhura Raja, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 07:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is because my system got stucked and all of it went collapsed.I am extremly sorry.I won't repeat it Thadevoos Jr (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to tell you that this malayalam film has crossed 100 crore please note it.please refer

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/mammootty-madhura-raja-crosses-rs-100-crore-in-45-days-5751652/ Thadevoos Jr (talk) 07:51, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a poor or primary source.I have seen the use of this news linl in other reference Thadevoos Jr (talk) 07:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is – you asked about it on the talk page and were told that was the case, and it has already been discussed and explained on that talk page exactly why it is primary – so how come you added it to the article anyway? You claim that this Indianexpress article has been used as a reference elsewhere on Wikipedia (if I understand you correctly). First, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS that is not a reason to add it against existing consensus in this article, and second, I can't find where that is. Where in Wikipedia is the Indian Express article from 28 May called "Mammootty starrer Madhura Raja [...]" used? --bonadea contributions talk 08:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me what are the reliable source.Because The above is the article in the Indian express which is one of the best news paper in india.So you are telling that news paper are wrong Thadevoos Jr (talk) 10:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is a discussion and explanation on the article talk page, there is no use duplicating it here. Basically, it is not about whether IE is a reliable newspaper but about the fact that the information comes from the producers, not from an independent source. When you asked to have that source added with the new info, you were told that it does not work for this purpose. --bonadea contributions talk 10:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed box office of shylock.can i ask you one thing.Why are you doing this only to Mammootty movies. Thadevoos Jr (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with that genre, but it is not a matter of which type of film it is, but the exact same issue as with Madhura Raja. I am sure hundreds of movie articles have the same type of issue. Nobody can solve all problems in Wikipedia, but the main thing is that we don't allow issues to multiply. For the future, please take questions like this to the article talk pages, and engage in discussion if you disagree with the replies, rather than ignoring them. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 10:26, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have removed box office collection of shylock which is by citied by times of india.Is this news paper article fake.The hindu,times of india,the Indian express are the leading news paper in india.kindly note it Thadevoos Jr (talk) 10:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your reply Thadevoos Jr (talk) 10:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.filmibeat.com/malayalam/news/2020/shylock-box-office-collections-the-mammootty-starrer-enters-the-50-crore-club-294696.html Collection of shylock Thadevoos Jr (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Mamangam (2019 film). Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please read and follow Help:Referencing for beginners and add proper references. not External links in the body or infobox - Arjayay (talk) 11:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to add external link that's why i diid like that.

Thadevoos Jr (talk) 13:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you change this in the most collected malayalam movie list it should be in the most collected list Thadevoos Jr (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Mhdsuhail111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:13, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry please unblock my account.I won't repeat this Thadevoos Jr (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]