User talk:TheOndaMoneyShow
Spam in On da Money Show
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on On da Money Show, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because On da Money Show is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting On da Money Show, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]
This kind of activity is considered spamming and forbidden by policies, and also violates our username policy.
However, if you feel that there has been a mistake in your blocking, please appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or email the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Please check that your new username has not already been taken by checking this list. Cirt (talk) 05:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)unblock hangon here we go again. Now it sems that my USER name is innappropriate. I have submitted previous replies that address the subject matter of promotional content. ONCE MORE FOR THE RECORD, AN ARTICLE IS EITHER PROMOTIONAL IN NATURE OR IT ISN'T. WHO AUTHORED THE ARTICLE IS IRRELEVANT. AM I NOW TO UNDERSTAND THAT YOU TREAT ARTICLES DIFFERENTLY DEPENDING ON WHO WROTE THEM? WHERE IS THE LOGIC IN THAT? OK, I have spent an inordinate amount of time on submission of this article to yourselves. In closing on promotion, The On da Money Show is an non-commercial not for-profit. concern 70,000 wikipedia entries are for retail music albums. Your inconsistencies are infuriating. Finally, on the subject of notability, the world-wide general public deem me to be notable as evidenced by my viewing figures. I am seriously thinking about having my viewing audience petition Wikipedia stating that they consider the show "notable" In closing, be advised that I am prepared to change my USER naqme if this is inconsistence with your username policies. Finally, I am now entirely vested in persuing this procedure.