You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
Re your mail - if thats a promise to be good (reply here if so; means you promise to obey 3RR carefully in future and leave the article alone for 24h) I can unblock you William M. Connolley19:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course I'll be good : ) My breaking the WP:3RR rule was not at all intentional - in fact I had made a point quite some time ago of making sure not to. I lost count today though, and for that I apologise. Thank you. THEPROMENADER19:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Nothing was very obvious in today's move/move reverts - one of the reasons I lost count.
If clarification you would like, this was the version reverted to, but this became this with User:Metropolitan's edits, and this after many corrections/edits by yours truely. I don't know how it was done, perhaps by cut and paste or moving a precedent version, but in moving the page, User:Hardouin somehow reverted it to its former state.
Although it is quite clear that he broke the WP:3RR rule too, I think I'll drop it for this time - although I don't agree with his pushy reverting and his pushing opinon as fact, I don't have a vendetta out for the guy. You gave me a break, so I'll give him one too. Thanks for your being quite kind through all this. THEPROMENADER19:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
