User talk:The Zig
Light-year
[edit]Thank you for reminding me that this is a measure of distance (I did actually already know as much). The point I was trying to get across was that measuring pregnancy in lunar months is just as silly. Again thanks.Drrem (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Changes to pregnancy page.
[edit]Hi TZ.
Not only do I not mind you changing my last edit but I appreciate the constructive help you are offering. I obviously cannot say as much for all those over-eager editors who seem to get their kicks from "reverting" something to its original erroneous form.
I also enjoyed reading the bit about not biting newbies. It is certainly neither easy nor instinctive moving around in here and any constructive advice is welcome. Trying to make something better takes time and effort whereas destroying it - on Wikipedia - can be done with a simple click of the mouse (I think).--Drrem (talk) 08:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Further changes
[edit]Hi TZ.
The first 5 lines of "Pregnancy characteristics" are much plainer reading now.
I haven't added references, but there weren't any there prior to my edit anyhow.
What I have written is NOT opinion (mine or anyone else's) but is pure medical FACT so I don't know on what logical basis anyone can object (if not just for the sake of objection and "reversion").
--Drrem (talk) 09:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Mr Zig, who is editing Battle Royale pages...IMDb by any chance?
Ha ha, this is Addy/Caissa's DeathAngel if it is you! Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Marenghi
[edit]Cheers on the baby, I kept trying to keep this short but I like to be clear, you can always just ignore if you're not interested. Sources are needed for claims not already self-evident in the primary material, right? Poor production in the show is, in my opinion, self-evident. (We could just describe all the examples of poor production but I think making that judgement is safe/uncontroversial.) Since this is a comedic show, we are simply describing elements of the show. If we said "the funniest part of the show is" or "what makes this funnier than that show is" then I think there would be a problem. If it's just the word "humour" there that you feel is problematic you can simply change it to "The show parodies the horror genre including elements of poor production, etc." but as I said before I find it a bit pedantic. It's a comedy show, it aims for humour, we're describing some of the elements, not making qualitative assessments. I added a source from the External Links for now.
As to number of sources, most of the sources (that are actually necessary) in the other articles refer to events outside the show, such as future production, reception, etc. which means you obviously can't cite the primary material. They're also much bigger for the most part and therefore have more information, and therefore higher need for citations. (3/4 of the citations in the Red Dwarf article pertain to backing up controversial claims like "the main setting of Red Dwarf is on the spaceship 'Red Dwarf'" which is, I hope we can agree, somewhat unnecessary.) If there are claims that need sourcing, tag them/remove them (as you've generally been doing, it's just this one sentence and the general tendency it is part of that gets to me). Originally, if you check the history, there were tons of OR statements about what specific shows it was parodying and praise and stuff, but I cut it all down to one sentence, which I thought was self-evident/uncontroversial/neutral.
As to an AFD, I highly doubt it will happen. It passes notability so it won't get deleted. If someone does get overzealous and nominates it, it would most likely be split between keep/keep+rewrite/keep+clean up at worst. Since the show never became too big it likely will never become a huge article since there's very little information out there, but it won't get deleted. I'm fine with the template at the top since I think it's justified and encourages people to find sources for information not sourced within the primary material. You said it makes a lot of claims for only having one source but I'm not sure what that refers to (maybe the character section? pretty unencyclopedic section imo). Sorry for the length, take care --TM 19:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
One last thing, here's the initial overhaul I'd done on the article a while ago [1] just to give you an idea of why I feel like that one sentence is relatively safe in the context of this article. Also, the reception section is definitely where citations are needed. i'll go away now. --TM 20:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, that's an amazing improvement. Thanks for your effort. I made a few grammar tweaks but there wasn't much to improve on. --TM 19:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Battle Royale
[edit]Hey Zig, hows it going? Noticed you editing the Battle Royale article earlier, which is fantastic because I was about to contact you about that. I'm sick of all the BR articles being a total disgrace, and reckon we should work together to really sort them all out. There's two main things I think we need to address. First, the character pages all need a standard form and standard information. Second, sources! We need third party sources that we can add about anything/everything to these articles. What do you say, we go for this? Caissa's DeathAngel (talk) 20:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:X³-ternal Docking.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:X³-ternal Docking.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
File copyright problem with File:X2 Centaur.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:X2 Centaur.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 19:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Orphaned non-free image File:XU Boron.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:XU Boron.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:XU Paranid.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:XU Paranid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:X3 Argon.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:X3 Argon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:X3 Split.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:X3 Split.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:X3 Julian.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:X3 Julian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
