User talk:The expert101

January 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Raz Simone without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 08:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Raz Simone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Ashley yoursmile! 08:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raz Simone, you may be blocked from editing. B732 (talk) 08:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Raz Simone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ashley yoursmile! 08:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the expert101 I am trying to remove false information from this profile which involves libel, slander, and defamation

The content that you've removed is properly referenced and sourced. Please stop. Also, ping @Ashleyyoursmile: B732 (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raz Simone. B732 (talk) 08:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:The_expert101 reported by User:Ashleyyoursmile (Result: ). Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 08:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]