User talk:The ultimator

November 2007[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chippawa, Ontario, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 22:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chippawa, Ontario, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 22:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nike, Inc. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 13:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

A tag has been placed on "Rule 34", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tardis (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chippawa, Ontario article[edit]

We obviously have a difference of opinion at to whether the waterway flowing through Chippawa should be called "Chippawa Creek", or "Chippawa Crick". I have placed a Request for comment on the talk page of that article, and also made my comments and listed my opinions - you are invited to add your comments and opinions on the subject. Upon reaching a consensus, we will define one, the other, or both as the term to be used in future. Radtek67 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chip chocolate[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Chip chocolate, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Kanye West. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kanye West, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 20:37, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Reddit page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Astro lounge.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Astro lounge.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]