User talk:Thekingofbankside

Welcome!

Hello, Thekingofbankside, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Barry m (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Your recent edit to Croome Park (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 16:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Southside.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Southside.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Croome river park.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Croome river park.JPG. The copy called Image:Croome river park.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 00:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Croome river park.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Croome river park.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dunstall castle folly.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dunstall castle folly.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Dunstall castle folly.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Dunstall castle folly.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:The Rotunda Croome.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:The Rotunda Croome.JPG. The copy called Image:The Rotunda Croome.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Rotunda Croome.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Rotunda Croome.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pirton Caslte folly.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Pirton Caslte folly.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The Owl's nest croome.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:The Owl's nest croome.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Croome.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Croome.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croome Park

Hi Thekingofbankside! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as being in need of a little attention or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see talk:Croome Park.--Kudpung (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Croome Park

Hi Thekingofbankside! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as being in need of considerable attention to avoid risk of deletion. If you can help with these minor issues please see Talk:Croome Park#Multiple issues Kudpung (talk)

File:Southside2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Southside2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]