User talk:Theoschela

3RR warning[edit]

Please note that you have just made your 4th revert in 24 hours and may be blocked. -999 (Talk) 22:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sock block[edit]

You're indef blocked as a probable sock William M. Connolley 19:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theoschela (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason I was blocked and will not dispute it. I do apologize however. I'm asking to be unblocked so I can contribute to theosophical history, especially between 1900-1933. I appreciate your consideration

Decline reason:

If you are not even disputing the block reason, i.e. that this is a sockpuppet account, then there's no reason to lift it. You are free to contribute constructively under your main account, steering clear of 3RR. -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not a sockpuppet account - what I do not dispute is that I acted against policy - that is, a friend invited me to defend a position - which is against policy.

I'm asking you to please reconsider the block/unblock and I will not act against wiki policy again. Thank-you again for your consideration.

Unblock I've butted heads with this user, but... as they have identified their reasons for being here and have passed a checkuser check, I have no problem with them being restored. Theoschela, just make sure when you join a discussion on someone's request, you point it out like I did here for instance. - Richfife 17:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you're unblocked. Regard yourself as on probation - you'll be reblocked if you're vaguely naughty William M. Connolley 18:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-: Thank-you gentlemen. You will find me a fair and reasonable contributor.

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

The article Ascended master, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.