User talk:ThinkBlue

Archives

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Admin?

Are you an administrator because you should be! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo III (talk • contribs) 01:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Just looking over your stats it looks like you should be one youre so into this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo III (talk • contribs) 01:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:DX/Kliq

Yeah I know, I am about to, does the 3RR rule however apply to me? (because the info he is adding is speculation) and I have reverted it about 4 times now.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 00:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok. We'll see how it goes.Thanks "wikifriend". We should have an alliance or something ..lolTrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 00:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

These newbies really dont understand Wikipedia. *Sigh*, oh well. Now he is reverting TJ's edits, can I know report him? "Alliance"-Im cool with LAX too, I guess I should ask him for membership huh?--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok It's really complicated can you do it for me? --TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Nikki took care of it, thank god. This guy has been reverting not only on the DX article but on the ECW page.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha...u just read my mind because that's exactly what I wrote on LAX's talk page.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

TLT sounds cool to me...how about TLT United?..lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

or D-X..lol...How about a name modeled after the "N.W.O"??TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 02:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Both "The Kliq" and "TLT United" sound good to me. Cheers, LAX 02:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

So LAX said its what we decide so do u like the t.L.t, or t.L.t United or t.L.t [something else] or the Kliq? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Well ok i guess.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 21:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, sounds good. BTW, you're welcome. Cheers, LAX 21:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking a PPV, either a WrestleMania or a Survivor Series. Cheers, LAX 21:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Sounds ok to me. Umm first I have to finish Over the Edge (1999) and then I guess we can work on one of the following...

• Complete Over the Edge (1998)
• Complete the many WWE No Way Out articles.
• Complete the Royal Rumble (2008)

TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 21:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking '02, but '06 sounds good too. Cheers, LAX 21:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Im not sure, but it is a current class article. Buh yeah either NWO or OTE??--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 21:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania 21 with Zenlax and bulletproof. Cheers, LAX 21:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Well since LAX is busy with WM21, you can either start the OTE 98 article, or help me finish OTE 99 and then we can both work on OTE 98 or a NWO articel. Up to you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh great, umm just to write the Aftermath section (whats there right now is what was originally in the WWF Over the Edge article). You can either source that or write a different aftermath. Remember to source each sentence as I wish for this to be the projects next FA. =). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Whenever you're done with Unforgiven (I'll probably be done with WrestleMania by then). Cheers, LAX 21:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Well not really, look at what I have written its all sourced. But if it's to complicated you don't have too. You can finish Unforgiven and then when we are all done we can work on something else.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 22:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok, look at some of my sources mayby they shed some light on it. The aftermath should really include RAW is Owen and what went on with the WWF title feud.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 22:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

So according to everyones comments, it looks like Survivor Series (2002) will be our first project. Cheers, LAX 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, we should somehow reserve it. As for the box, I don't know how we would incorporate all of us into one userbox. Cheers, LAX 00:20, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Both good ideas. What color would we use for the box? Cheers, LAX 00:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Black and Blue sounds good to me; I don't really care what colors we use. Cheers, LAX 00:32, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. ;) Cheers, LAX 00:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

What would I link "The Kliq" to in the box. BTW, you might wanna archive you're talk page, it's getting kinda long. Cheers, LAX 00:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers, LAX 00:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm drawin' a blank here. This is all I've come up with so far:

The Kliq

This user is a member of The Kliq

−Cheers, LAX 01:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, but I just don't know what to use. Any suggestions? Cheers, LAX 01:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice. I've changed our box to that design. Cheers, LAX 01:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure. I was going to inform him sometime soon. Cheers, LAX 00:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I think we could start on Survivor Series. It seems like all of us are pretty much done with our PPVs; I just have some minor expansion to do on WrestleMania. Cheers, LAX 00:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. I'll probably pull an all nighter, and I'll do what I can with it. Cheers, LAX 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

It's no problem really. What time will you probably getting off (UTC time)? Cheers, LAX 01:17, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Great, that's plenty of time. Cheers, LAX 01:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm starting the lead paragraph right now. I'll hit you up when I need you. Cheers, LAX 01:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Cheers, LAX 01:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Do you know if WrestleView a reliable source? Cheers, LAX 02:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I was asking because SLAM! Sports doesn't have a review (figures). Cheers, LAX 02:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I know, I was shocked too, but yeah, the DVD should be a good ref. Cheers, LAX 02:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I use that alot since WWE.com's RAW and SmackDown! archives only go mid 2005. Cheers, LAX 02:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Problems

Oh yeah I am. I am trying to keep a watch for vandalism for the Smash Bros. Pages and you will not believe how much of it there can be...--Smashbrosboy (talk) 03:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Unforgiven (2004)

GREAT JOB! on the article I like it, it looks like a GA candidate. When you are done you should put it up for peer review and then let's see if it's a GA candidate. Also I recommend sourcing the matches in the results section.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 00:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh my bad, I was talking about the 2004 one. So yea the above comment applies to it. How does Over the Edge (1999) look.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, yea I will add some. May I recommend you archive your talk page? =DTrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm...who is back??--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

OMG!! NOT HIM!!!...*sigh* If he continues to do nonsense he will end up being blocked. Do you think No Way Out (2004) is a GA? Cuz I nominated it for GA. --TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

UF 06 looks great, especially your after math section. It's strong. One thing you might want to do is to source most of the sentences, that's just me. But other than that it look's great.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha...sure...have you ever thought of being an admin?TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

No reason, just wondering. --TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 01:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Someday I would..I would add it if it was a serious knee injury that kept him out of action other than that than no.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 02:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

In that case then yeah you should add it. --TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 02:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to interrupt, but do either of you think I would be a good admin? Cheers, LAX 02:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that really means alot to me. Cheers, LAX 02:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I wanna run, but I don't feel I could handle that much responsibility. You know what I mean? Cheers, LAX 02:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I do know what you mean, I think about that all the time. I still think this project [WP:PW] could use another admin or two. Unforgiven, looks great, just add some images and I think you're pretty much set. Cheers, LAX 02:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

You don't have to, but it would be nice to have it. Cheers, LAX 03:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. If you were to add it, I would just add the referees, commentators, interviewers, and ring announcers. Cheers, LAX 03:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I'd save you some money, but I'm afraid I don't own it. Sorry. Cheers, LAX 03:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Never thought of that. Cheers, LAX 03:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Only for a Side headlock. Cheers, LAX 04:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Here. Cheers, LAX 04:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

That, I don't know. lol. Cheers, LAX 04:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I was going to start with the Lesnar/Show feud. What feud you goin' to start with? Cheers, LAX 04:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

It looks good, however a few things stand out. I don't have time to point them all out so I will show you them tomorrow Cheers, TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 05:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright in the beginning of the article The main event was for the World Heavyweight Championship between Randy Orton and Triple H, in which Triple H won after he hit Orton with a chair shot, which was followed by a Pedigree on the same chair. Cant you reword this you like "...where Triple H defeated Orton after a Pedigree onto a steel chair/in which Triple H won after a pedigree on Orton onto a steel chair."? Because I don't think adding that he used a chair previously is really all that important. What you think?--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 02:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

When stating dates like "on the September 6 edition of ..." you should preferably say the full date mm/dd/yy and wiki link it. Also you should say the result of the undercard matches in the excerpt of the article. Also state what annual Unforgiven it is like "and it was the ...annual Unforgiven". Also when talking about titles, you should say the WWE watever championship. Also avoid redirects, and that should be all.--TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 03:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I am sorry about not editing the past coup weeks... i had an unexpected death in the family happen. has the article been created yet? EWC Champion (talk) 04:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Blue!

I was just wondering, does "The Kliq" have room for a fourth member? *wink wink* lol. iMatthew 14:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

A "Kliq" sounds kinda ..... well you know.... Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Yup, I was briefly discussing this with LAX earlier today. So far, I've only added a reference, but I will definitely work on it further. iMatthew 00:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I was looking at it earlier today, I think it looks great, the only thing I would change is probably spreading out the pictures of Jericho, Stratus, Michaels, and HHH. They are too close together. Maybe getting another picture or something. iMatthew 00:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

A tad-bit. iMatthew 00:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

It's a minor problem, but it's good that your fixing it. iMatthew 00:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I think that Unforgiven (04) should be nominated for GA status. iMatthew 01:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I see nothing wrong with the article. What were Truco and LAX's opinions on it? iMatthew 01:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Tech43

Have you seen this? After all we've done trying to get him back, he leaves. Cheers, LAX 15:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Yeah, I have no problem with that. Cheers, LAX 01:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe so. Cheers, LAX 01:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

No, actually I have it saved on my computer right now. Cheers, LAX 01:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

That's cool. Cheers, LAX 01:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks good so far. Cheers, LAX 01:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Question, Should I mention that Angle defeated both Lesnar and Show at Vengeance as part of the Lesnar/Show feud? Cheers, LAX 02:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I would say so. Cheers, LAX 02:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Cheers, LAX 02:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know, I'll have to read. I'm a total idiot, I thought Vengeance '03 was Vengeance '02. But, should that still go into the Aftermath section? Cheers, LAX 02:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I'd say yes because: 1.) Angle defeated Show later that year at Armageddon, 2.) Lesnar defeated Angle at WrestleMania, 3.) Angle defeated Lesnar at SummerSlam, and 4.) The three faced off at Vengeance (which all happened within an eight month span). Cheers, LAX 02:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Don't know, haven't spoke with him lately. Cheers, LAX 02:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

He said he was, and all he's done so far is add a reference. Cheers, LAX 02:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. I know him to well. I know he [Hornetman] is from Haines City, Florida, he is a devoted Christan, he's a male, and I know he is IP 72.186.91.47. Look at his introduction at WT:PW and look here. It all becomes so obvious. Cheers, LAX 02:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Please tell TJ Spyke or bulletproof. They are probably the two who know Hornetman the best. Cheers, LAX 02:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I know hornetman as well, and that IS DEFINITELY him. Just look at User:Florida16's user page.TrUcO9311 ^TaLk / _SiGn 02:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Too late now, he already admitted at WT:PW. Cheers, LAX 03:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

No doubt about it. IMO, all the evidence I provided to you, is more than enough to convince admins. Cheers, LAX 03:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

You should become an admin

I have been looking at your contribs and I really think you should put in a RFA. I think I am the second one who said this but...--Smashbrosboy (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Two things

See discussion:

Here.

Contribute to it.--72.186.91.47 (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

And, you might want to check this out Here.-72.186.91.47 (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

you's a bitch nigger!!!