Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KJ «Click Here» 04:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly suggest you stay away from that article; you seem to be on a mission. Removing everything that is not verified is not a proper editing tactic: removal in a BLP must be done judiciously and I see no evidence that you have much justification for your edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - as you can probably tell, I am still struggling to figure out how to properly make edits on wikipedia - I was hoping that flagging the article for deletion would lead to a fuller analysis of whether or not the standards of notability were really met, but with my limited editing skills I have not been able to figure out how to proceed with that process beyond added the "flag for deletion" tag. I will refrain from editing the page for now, but please know that my attempts to edit the page have been good-natured and done with the intention of ensuring info on Wikipedia is reliably and accurately sourced. Tiakat333 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it was discussed, and the decision was it's not to be deleted, so that matter for now is settled: it is frowned upon to nominate the same article twice within a short period. Deleting is not the same as sourcing, of course; if you can indicate that you have sourced things, then the deletion of other things doesn't look like you're trying to get rid of the article. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
