User talk:Tinnet

Third opinion request

Thank you for listing your dispute at Wikipedia:Third opinion. Your request did not follow the guidelines for listing disputes. These guidelines are in place because they make sure that the editor who writes the Third Opinion is not biased, and that (s)he can easily see what the dispute is about.

The description of the dispute should be concise and neutral, and you should sign with the timestamp only. A concise and neutral description means that only the subject matter of the dispute should be described, and not your (nor anyone else's) views on it. For example, in a dispute about reliable sources, do not write "He thinks this source is unreliable", but rather write "Dispute about the reliability of a source". To sign with only the timestamp, and without your username, use five tildes (~~~~~) instead of four.

Your request for a Third Opinion may have been edited by another editor to follow the guidelines - feel free to edit it again if necessary. If the dispute you want to list is of such a nature that it cannot follow the guidelines, another part of the dispute resolution process may be able to help you. For example, Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts is a good place to alert others to a particular editor's behaviour. Thank you for going to the dispute resolution process with your dispute. --Darkwind (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the introduction and the hints on the third opinion request :) Tinnet 09:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to help you out on the RFI issue. User:Krator (t c) 21:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) How is it "unintentional" if you keep replacing an article with worse content? The WP:VAN page is not very clear on the unintentional part. Tinnet 09:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]