User talk:Tkracinski

Peer review To begin with I thought the lead was an easy read and straight to the point. As a group you guys were able to hit all of the main points in just a few short compact sentences. For the lead I would suggest looking into a secondary source although referencing the website itself isn't bad and it still makes for an easy read. The history section was well written, it gives history and insight to some key individuals. There were some minor issues like organizing the information in order and some of the paragraphs don't necessarily read like a Wikipedia page. Also avoid being repetitive with previously mentioned information. The information in regards to funding is very thorough and well written, maybe consider fining more sources to to give some more background information about the different programs. As a reader I thought the article was full of information and each sections flows right into the next. Again some minor tweaks could be adding more sources for clarity and cleaning up the organization/wording in certain sections. Other than that great work you guys. 1KendalHarris (talk) 01:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Tkracinski, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)