User talk:Tomjohnwick
October 2023
[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Los Angeles General Medical Center, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Geoff | Who, me? 12:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Aravind Eye Hospitals. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 12:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've reverted a large number of your edits from today. Wikipedia is deliberately written in straightforward language to make it more accessible to our readers, many of which are not native English speakers. Saying the same thing in longer, more complicated words does not improve the encyclopedia. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I've reverted some more of your edits, which are becoming disruptive. Please stop editing and take your time to understand why what you're doing is unhelpful, otherwise you are likely to be blocked from editing. Wham2001 (talk) 13:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Applus2021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Applus2021. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 11:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.