User talk:TomorrowsDream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome[edit]

Hi TomorrowsDream, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --Roleplayer (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Stimson managerial stats[edit]

Please could you elaborate as to the source of the data for Grays and Stevenage..........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wycombe[edit]

Hey. You got there just before me reverting this :) I hate edit conflicts! Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 22:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I nearly left it for someone else. Would've been helpful if they'd provided a reason for their deletion but you can't even contact an unregistered member. You're a big contributer to the Bucks project and Wycombe page. Any big plans for improving it? I'll help where I can. TomorrowsDream (talk) 08:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did plan on re-writing the High Wycombe article, and I got as far as copying it to my userspace and blanking it, ready for a re-write here when I gave up. There's a lot of junk in the current article, but we'd need lots of references to suppport some of the stuff in there. But if I do try to do anything, I'll tell you. Cheers. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 15:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there T.DREAM, VASCO from Portugal here,

about this players, i (first of all) would like to present my apologies in the summaries, i tend - for no apparent reason - to get a little hysterical when i see stuff out of the ordinary. Please accept my apologies if you felt in any way offended.

About the technical stuff: i removed SOCCERBASE.COM because i feel that that site is very incomplete for non-English players (English leagues that is), so it's not very notable. To have it both as LINK and REF (that web source or any other) is quite redundant, i feel it should be one or the other thing, not both. I have made some further adjustments after your reversions, please let me know your views.

Again, sorry for any incovenience on my part, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • P.S. I just edited Sergi Enrich, with the same approach, and, as you can see, both storylines have been significantly improved. I hope you find it to your satisfaction. Cheers! --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I already apologized for any incovenience in summaries, but it looks like i merit no words from you, okey, won't bother you again. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD[edit]

I'm not following why you tagged Philip McDonagh as a G10. can you enlighten me? --SPhilbrickT 16:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see my comment on the discussion page? TomorrowsDream (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hi there DREAM, VASCO here,

I know you will not answer me (have no idea why!), but if you understand the contents of this message it will be enough: as you did in Alhassane Keita, please do not remove X or Y categories just because X or Y footballer has changed clubs/countries. The categories, once a footballer (and not only footballers) has become "eligible" for them, are PERMANENT.

Please respect other people's work, have a nice weekend, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]