Jump to content

User talk:Tresiden: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CSD reasons: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
== Vandalism ==


Sorry I clicked the wrong user who did it. I sincerely apologise.
--[[User:Dew87|Dew87]] ([[User talk:Dew87|talk]]) 17:59, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


Dick


== Quick Question ==
== Quick Question ==

Revision as of 16:58, 19 May 2008


Dick

Quick Question

Can i upload anime screenshots, and then use them on my userprofile? thanks. P.S. Darn you for my excel saga ¬.¬

~Beegee7730 (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ah ok i understand now. [Sifts through the many articles of wikipedia looking for an uncopyrighted image]

~Beegee7730 (talk) 08:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization of 斗織

Hello, I was wondering if you could explain your recent edit to the Characters of X (manga) page, in which you marked my edit to the romanization of 斗織 as vandalism and reverted it. According to the Wikipedia policy on romanizing Japanese names, use of apostrophes should be avoided except in the case of the syllabic "n" followed by a vowel; in addition, the section is titled "Tooru Magami", without the apostrophe. I have reverted your edit for now; however, since I'm unfamiliar with the name, my apologies in advance for the misunderstanding if it is supposed to be romanized in that way. Thanks! rairakku (talk) 21:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's all right. I'm glad it's been cleared up. rairakku (talk) 23:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Tresiden/god

User:Tresiden/god, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tresiden/god and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Tresiden/god during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Novidmarana (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tory party

I think you will find that my description is fairly accurate, I'll bet I could find a source somewhere. --Cnatcomm (talk) 22:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 163.1.236.5 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Woody (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much for the userboxes. They look great. I appreciate you taking the time to make them up for me. Have a great day!--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 04:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CSD reasons

Please exercise a little more care with tagging articles for speedy deletion. ...and Justus For All: Official Album was clearly not patent nonsense, certainly not by Wikipedia's definition. Being poorly written is not a criterion for speedy deletion unless it is unsalvageable. As it is, this is a future album already with several reports in the media. BigBlueFish (talk) 16:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]