User talk:TrevorS13

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Salmat, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. This also applies to spelling changes you made in several other articles, including ELPAC Test, Cheetham Hill Gang, Deaf Children Australia, and Architecture of Vancouver. bonadea contributions talk 22:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that was my bad because I am not familiar with spellings from other varieties of English. I've learned to leave them alone, and I thank you for bringing this to my attention. TrevorS13 (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

No problem – it was obviously just a misunderstanding, but I wanted to give you a heads-up about it. I should probably also have said that I did a really quick check of other contributions from you which were perfectly good. Thanks for your contributions, and happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 17:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, again! I look forward to learning to be a better editor! TrevorS13 (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winder Soldier-Centered Medical Home

The article Winder Soldier-Centered Medical Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth sourcing to show it passes GNG. Would have redirected to Joint Base Lewis-McChord or Madigan Army Medical Center, but is mentioned in neither of those articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)