User talk:TrollHistorian

Talking to myself here:

Things I like to discuss:

History of trolling of a troll organization
Troll on Troll fights
Troll Groups
Stance

I have already been welcomed. (page cleared)

Chat

Category Internet Trolling

Hey I know you wanted to place Category: Internet Trolling as one of your intresting articles, but thiers a problem: you see when you linked to the article you accidently added yourself to the category, I took it out for ya. Deathawk 21:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added it back and fixed the link - what you wanted was to type [[:Category:Internet trolling]], not [[Category:Internet trolling]] - the colon before the 'category' turns it into a link rather than adding yourself. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 22:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Palestinian Israeli Conflict

I saw you left me a message, and I looked at what you merged and realized that you actually (almost) fully reverted from what I can tell. I hope your intentions are good but you reintroduced all the bias in the article I was trying to avoid: 1- Before 1948, the place was called Palestine. Saying it was called Land of Israel (sometimes known as the region of Palestine) is distortion of fact and reads like the article was written by a militia group. 2- Since when have Palestinian rioters ever been referred to as "sunni Muslims" in lieu of being called "Palestinians"? What kind of nonsense is this? And Palestinian rioters very often include Christians, merely judging from the number of Christians that have been killed by the Israeli army. 3- The narrative for the Palestinian refugee problem differs depending on who you ask, and I tried to make that clear but you just reverted to the the militant zionist version - not the Israeli version, the militant zionist version. 4- Transjordan became Jordan in 1946, so it couldn't have been Transjordan that invaded Palestine in 1948. 5- The "local Arabs" were already at war with the Yishuv before 1948. 6- THere is no evidence that foreign Christians were banned from visiting Jerusalem - or foreign Jews for that matter - how would the Jordanian authorities even know the religion of the foreigners? 7- It is very very well known that Israeli soldiers were guarding the entrances to Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps - why else was Sharon found responsible for the massacre? Yet you chose to remove this clear-as-day fact from my edits. 8- Events attributed to December 14 1988 completely predate the actual events by 6-10 years, but you just changed it back to what it was previously with slight "merges" that still returned the section to complete nonsense. 9- How could the 1988 "first suicide attack" be called one when there was no knowledge if the attacker intended to die, notwithstanding the fact that he lived? 10- The fact that Sharon had 1000 policemen with him when he visited the mount was an overwhelming reason for the riots - he made his "visit" look like an incursion. Yet you conveniently removed mention of the 1000 policemen. 11- The Palestinian attacks in Israel declined by 90% NOT in 2002 when the wall was being built, but much later as Hamas signed a ceasefire (or agreed to one) with then prime minister Mahmoud Abbas. To state that "Wall was built, terror fell by 90%" just like that is incredibly misleading. Perhaps I should post this on the article page as well. -Scott

Your edits reverted the name of the land in question and you repeated used the word Zionist to describe israel. You used loaded terms and introduced ambiguous hedge words. I merged in most of your stuff that legitimate and appropriate for the article. You can explain away extra details in the pages that deal with the actual events, they do not belong in the timeline. The simple fact is that you reverted information twice and did not remerge and did not remove bias you instead mislabelled groups unnecessarily and even generalized what was accurate. --TrollHistorian 00:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Well, everyone else answered it for me. Really, there was no point in keeping things going, it was obviously going to delete, there was no way whatsoever we could cite things per WP:V. I hate to say it, but keeping it open longer is just going to invite trollfests and isn't going to provide a meaningful discussion. Really, all you're going to see after 2 days or so is !vote gathering, which really doesn't build consensus at all. I also did go thru the comments very deeply, most of the "survived previous AfD's" really didn't prove why or why not, most of those previous were speedy closed within hours not days. Please take a look at WP:V and you'll see what I mean on the sourcing issue. Trust me, I didn't take this one lightly. -- Tawker 07:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ANUS and WP:ORG

It isn't clear to me what section of WP:ORG it would meet. Could you be more specific? JoshuaZ 04:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey friend, ANUS is up for deletion again, and we probably need your help against the bloody bastards. Cheers. 24.57.119.120 (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia Dramatica References

Most of these links relate to Jason_Fortuny#Jason_Fortuny_and_Craigslist craiglist thing. But there are probably other media references and reviews. With a few more links the ED article could be revivified. --TrollHistorian 18:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable: http://www.macleans.ca/culture/entertainment/article.jsp?content=20061002_133913_133913 http://www.nu.nl/news/822915/56/Man_publiceert_reacties_sm-advertentie_op_internet.html http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/09/17/PKG6BKQQA41.DTL&type=printable

MSNBC Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y6LqhrdAxg [1:08]

Journalist Blog: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2006/09/craigslist.html?entry_id=1553329

Less Reliable: http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/05/john-edwards-virtual-attackers-unmasked/ http://www.blogto.com/music/2007/02/jeffree_star_wants_you_at_his_plastic_surgery_slumber_party/ http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2007/03/08/patriotic-nigras-interview-john-edwards-second-life/ http://www.waxy.org/archive/2006/09/08/sex_bait.shtml

ANI Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Cavalry (Message me) 22:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]