User talk:TruthSupressor

June 2024

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Dr Disrespect, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A random person's twitter is insufficient for the WP:BLP claims you are making. Walsh90210 (talk) 04:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You all want to suppress the truth. TruthSupressor (talk) 19:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I have to wait for the source being published as an article, aka, credible source (according to Wikipedia), to be quoted as a source... TruthSupressor (talk) 19:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 04:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahahahahahahahah you fool! TruthSupressor (talk) 18:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The truth cannot be suppressed!!!! TruthSupressor (talk) 19:00, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TruthSupressor (talk) 19:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TruthSupressor (talk) 19:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. TruthSupressor (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked ?

Reason:

Disruptive editing

Regret

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TruthSupressor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a big mistake taking on the giant of Wikipedia and its editors, ignored the final warning even though I was trying to get the truth out. I had sources, but not credible enough for Wikipedia, and violated their rules of editing an alive person's bio. Should have just added under their other categories.

Decline reason:

This does nothing to convince me you'd be a constructive editor if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.