User talk:Tulaneadam21

Sockpuppet case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Kikbguy. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 15:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers

An article that you have been involved in editing, Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers. Thank you. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 17:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

Regarding this edit: First of all, Zimzalabim did not have you blocked, an uninvolved administrator did (verify). Zimzabim has not abused or even used his administrative privileges at all; your own actions and personal attacks were what you got blocked, and it was an entirely different and uninvolved administrator who carried out the block. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 19:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I have gone out of my way not to use my administrative privileges involving your edits, and have instead reported you to other administrators for review. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't see how we could possibly be "threatened" by your information, given how lousy it is. You claim to be a law student who researched this for a paper, but it must not have been a very good paper, considering your lack of resources and lack of understanding of the topic. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 19:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

--VS ^talk 00:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]