User talk:Tuquoquefili

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tuquoquefili, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuquoquefili (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I work for a PR Agency and we have nothing to do with the user Sherlock4000 and the other blocked users. We are professionals in Wikipedia and were hired by Macro Bank to make a neutral article about Jorge Brito because the one made by user DaltonCastle and others has several mistakes that harms Brito's reputation. As a PR Agency this block hurts as deeply as we have in queue new articles for Wikipedia and we were changing and creating articles and now we can't save the changes. It's obvious that we will have the same arguments as the users that had defended the last version of the article because the one made by DaltonCastle is not neutral and that is why we were hired to improve it. I hope you can analyze this case, realize that we are professionals working and that this block is affecting our whole work. Many thanks!--Tuquoquefili (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence does not appear to support your assertion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuquoquefili (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuse me User talk:Anthony.bradbury, what is the evidence? Pardon me, despite being a PR Agency, we are still beginners and we are not familiarized with blocks nor bans yet. This is the first time we suffer this and we do not understand what to do and how can we avoid this situation. We want to accomplish all the standards of Wikipedia. Many thanks for your help.--Tuquoquefili (talk) 12:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.