User talk:Turtletop

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Turtletop! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Vanjagenije (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David Bain

I agree with your recent edit that removed the Michael Guest radio interview. It's minutiae. Akld guy (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for the praise (um, I suppose "90% positive and helpful" counts as praise). Like you, I have no hard feelings about anything that happened. It's simply that I thought my involvement was too great and may have looked to outsiders as a heavy handed approach. Unfortunately I was put in that position by MM who called on me many times by username for approval about material and citing. I really had no choice but to answer when specifically addressed, but it looked like I was dominating the entire scene. OTOH, I didn't mind, and even enjoyed, bringing him up to speed on citing and indenting. I continue to keep a close eye on the DB pages, and will certainly comment if I see the need, but I do think input from a few other editors may be necessary for balance, so have reduced my participation to allow them to take part. There are also other pages that I was simultaneously working on (and still am busy on). Best regards, and here's to courteous editing by us all!!! Akld guy (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Turtletop, just some friendly advice. You removed a statement in the article about what Michael Guest said, citing that he was an "unreliable source". That is not what that term means on Wikipedia. It is not about whether the person who made the statement (in this case Guest) is considered reliable, it is about whether the information is reported by a reliable source, in this case Radio NZ. Please read WP:RS for more information. Thanks Melcous (talk) 23:58, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Melcous. I understand your point. But that doesn't mean that inaccurate or irrelvant information should be included just because it was reported by a reliable source. Turtletop (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is Akld guy. I am out for the day and on smartphone. Cannot easily reply till this evening. Akld guy (talk) 01:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turtletop, in reference to your comments on my talk page, I have not had any private conversations with any other wikipedia editors about anything, including you. You should assume good faith from other editors. If you read the whole section on the talk page, Akld guy's comment "See what I mean" was fairly obviously in response to his earlier comment that changing that section would re-open the debate about including details about Laniet, which you then immediately suggested doing. Also, you should not remove or edit other people's comments on talk pages. If it something is particularly offensive, administrators can hide it, but this comment hardly qualifies as that. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing others talk page comments

Please do not do this again. I know Mr Maggoo is a bit WP:tendentious, but removing or refactoring others talk page comments is a definite no-no, unless they meet some strict criteria. AIRcorn (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If they go off topic it is best to simple hide the comments using {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} templates. If they revert those templates do not re-add them though. AIRcorn (talk) 22:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

You are the subject of an ANI investigation at here. Akld guy (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Turtletop, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. SQL ^{Query me!} 22:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SQL ^{Query me!} 08:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Turtletop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]